Guantanamo Prison Remains a Global Symbol of Injustice
By George Cassidy Payne*
HAVANA TIMES – Last week US Defense Secretary James Mattis visited troops at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Naval Station for the holiday. This visit came after recent UN reports of torture there, but the Secretary insisted that he was only going to meet with the troops to thank them for their service.
Pentagon spokesperson Major Ben Sakrisson confirmed that Mattis would not inspect detention facilities or discuss detainee policy.
Wouldn’t the Secretary of Defense be interested in the conditions of the world’s most infamous prison? Wouldn’t any CEO of his/her organization want to know what is happening on the ground, face to face?
It has been 16 years since another Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) visited GITMO, and since that time, close to 800 prisoners have been held at the facility; 731 of these detainees were released without charges; 15 of them were children under the age of 18; and 9 of them have died by suicide or other causes. According to Human Rights Watch, of the 41 detainees that remain at Guantanamo only 7, Abd-al-Rahim al-Nashri, Abd al Hadi al Iraqi, and five September 11, 2001 co-defendants face any formal charges.
Again, considering the facility’s history of torture, arrests without charges, locked up juveniles, and deaths of detainees, wouldn’t Mattis want to give the place a good look through? Or does the Secretary not want to know what goes on there?
The fact remains that Guantanamo Bay is still one of the most effective propaganda tools in the world for militant Islamic fundamentalists. The maximum security prison, based in Cuba, was set up by the Bush administration in January of 2002, apparently in response to the attacks of 9/11. But as former president Jimmy Carter has stated: “What has happened at Guantanamo Bay….does not represent the will of the American people.” Carter has also remarked, “I’m embarrassed about it, I think it’s wrong. I think it does give terrorists an unwarranted excuse to use despicable means to hurt innocent people.”
President Barack Obama has made this case in even stronger terms. “I believe the United States of America must remain a standard bearer in the conduct of war. That is what makes us different from those whom we fight. That is a source of our strength….We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend.”
Along with Carter and Obama, the majority of US citizens know that keeping GITMO open is tactically misguided and blatantly immoral. They know that it gives terrorists an opportunity to say, “Why can’t we torture? You do.” And “Why can’t we hold prisoners without charge? You do.” It makes our entire constitutional system of due process look ridiculous.
After 16 years, why have we failed to muster the moral and political courage to shut down this global symbol of evil?
—–
*HT Guest writer George Cassidy Payne is a freelance writer, adjunct professor of philosophy at the State University of New York (SUNY) and domestic violence counselor.
Even if there were not a single prisoner — and most of them are probably guilty as hell — in Gitmo, the very existence of an American base in a country that does not want it is profoundly stupid. [Insert Talleyrand quote re crimes and blunders here.]
An American government with a bare minimum of political sense would do something like this: return Guantanamo unconditionally to Cuba, but also propose to the Cubans that we jointly build a huge international medical university there, using Yankee dollars and Cuban expertise in the field of medical education, and together, over the next decade, qualitatively increase the number of medical personnel in the Americas (North and South). Reserve a percentage of places for Americans and Cubans, and fill the rest with aspiring doctors and nurses from Latin America, Asia and Africa.
It’s a pretty shocking indictment.
16 years of this mess.
Juveniles held without trial.
‘…the majority of US citizens know that keeping GITMO open is tactically misguided and blatantly immoral.’
A black stain on the USA’s grandoise claims of furthering democracy.