Cuba: A Normal Country

Armando Chaguaceda

Street of Centro Habana. Foto: Juan Suarez

HAVANA TIMES — From time to time, a friend, acquaintance or taxi driver in Mexico will tell me that they want to travel to Cuba and get to know the country. The myths surrounding the revolution, the stories about sizzling sex with local women, tourism or health offers or quite simply the wish to tour Old Havana and go for a dip in Varadero prompt them to ask me what time of the year is best for visiting my native country. For a while now, my laconic answer has been: “go before Cuba becomes a normal country.”

The problem is that normality – living under a capitalist economy, without the generous social policies which characterized Cuban socialism for several decades – is slowly encroaching upon people’s daily lives like a bitter certainty.

I am not referring to the lives of those who pay for expensive meals at lavish Christmas dinners or buy the latest in fashion and gadgets, but to the majority of the population, overwhelmed by years of under-consumption, depressed by indecent salaries and, to make matters even worse, unfit – both in terms of qualifications and material possessions – for any successful inclusion in the market reform process currently underway in the country.

This reform process, as Daron Acemoglu and J.A. Robinson teach us in their recent book Why Countries Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, reveal how, under an authoritarian government, political and economic institutions mutually reinforce their extractive character, in a vicious circle that wards off any possibility of inclusive, just and democratic change.

This is the financial logic behind the latest liberalizing – and formally positive – measure authorizing the sale of cars in Cuba. I say formally positive because any measure which serves to broaden the comfort of sectors of the population while eroding the power of the bureaucracy to assign consumer goods – directly and at its own discretion – has, in my opinion, a positive human impact and the potential to broaden plurality in the country.

The ways in which the measure is being implemented, however, reveal a deeper extractivist logic, which is evident even in the figures announced by the government.

Havana car delearship. Photo: cubadebate.cu

According to preliminary estimates (made on the basis of the announced prices), the cars currently offered in Cuba are being sold, cash down and without credit options, at 800 % their market price in the United States and Mexico – countries where salaries are much higher and road and service infrastructures infinitely superior.

Without a doubt, the island’s gerontocracy is applying a hybrid commercial policy, reminiscent of the Bantustans and Arab emirates: it pays its workers and consumers as though they lived in a Bantustan and charges them for goods and services as though they lived in an emirate.

Though profit rates – to invoke old Marx – are currently astronomical with these price policies, at one point the government, forced to move its unsold stock and after having swallowed up a mountain of money, may announce financing plans (with presumably onerous rates) and a gradual lowering of vehicle prices (perhaps down to 400 % of market price)

Some domesticated spirits will likely applaud such measures, calling them the result of “popular participation and demands” within a reform process that is advancing “slowly but surely.” In the meantime, the sale and purchase of old Russian Ladas and vintage American cars will continue to be a kind of rebellious and subversive practice undermining State monopolies, the option accessible to those who, with their meager earnings, seek to move about through their own means.

It remains to be seen whether the revenues amassed through such a feral price policy will lead to the announced improvement in public transportation, through the special fund to be created for this purpose. As there is no independent control mechanism, the State can decide to use these revenues as it sees fit – for political functions, homes for the military or police operations.

We can only hope this money will go to strengthening the material infrastructure, improving salaries and consolidating urban transportation cooperatives, where workers can manage their own affairs and see an increase in their earnings, to be able to offer services that meet the demands of citizens.

Looking out at the street. Photo: Juan Suarez

Changes such as authorizing the sale of vehicles, though beneficial for a given sector of Cuba’s population, not only reproduce the prevailing conditions of poverty and inequality but also benefit concrete actors and classes (the State bureaucracy, technocrats of emerging economic sectors and the petite bourgeoisie), interested in maintaining their positions of power or in securing greater participation in the reform process, so as to have greater access to the consumer market (in exchange for political support or loyalty).

When this does not go hand in hand with a redefinition of social spending – capable of combatting the noxious effects of two and a half decades of a nationwide crisis – or with a broadening of political rights, such market spaces do not lead to the empowerment of people. At the most, they lead to a recycling of the alliance between the dominant classes that have traditionally decided the fate of  the country.

This is why, when I urge my friends to hurry and visit Cuba before it becomes yet another normal country, I feel I am projecting onto the present my good (and perhaps idealized) memories of a Cuba that is no longer, a Cuba whose architects – our parents, grandparents and relatives – continue to live and survive on the island after having given their all for the construction of a better future.

The truth of the matter is that the social achievements that once defined the Cuban revolution and benefited the working majority are retreating to oblivion, and that we are witnessing the transition towards a form of State capitalism grounded in an extractive, monopolistic and rapacious growth model, where it is virtually impossible to lay the groundwork for an authentic, legally constituted State and inclusive forms of development.


47 thoughts on “Cuba: A Normal Country

  • January 11, 2014 at 11:37 am
    Permalink

    With respect, your questions are off topic. Besides, who cares?

  • January 11, 2014 at 11:24 am
    Permalink

    Faulty logic. Your ‘fatherland’ USSR had one of the world’s largest economies yet clearly based on idiotic principles. Cuba’s mid-level rankings on a list based on their self-reported self-serving statistics does not negate the overwhelming hard evidence that most young people in Cuba today want to live somewhere else. I will make it real simple for you to understand. Here are two of many examples: Cuba counts medical facilities in the WHO index that are closed or underutilized due to lack of maintenance. Cuban statistics count doctors who have left the profession to drive taxis. Cuba, for lack of working birth weight measuring scales, undercounts low birth weight babies. Doctors simply ‘eyeball’ newborns and release them as healthy. Other third world countries have a tendency to OVERSTATE their failings so as to qualify for greater UN funding and other available NGO assistance. Cuba, on the other hand, chooses to obscure their real weaknesses out of political arrogance.

  • January 11, 2014 at 10:22 am
    Permalink

    Do your own homework.
    I can give you a fish but then you won’t learn how to fish.
    Hint: use the W.H.O.’s Human Development Index to begin your research.
    Cuba is about 54th on the list.
    Look at all the capitalist countries of equal resources that fall below Cuba’s level for your answers.
    Because you think Cuba has a socialist economy which cannot work, the other 150 capitalist countries or so below Cuba’s HDI levels must have erroneous data submitted by their governments to place below a “failed socialist” economy such as Cuba has. .

  • January 11, 2014 at 10:17 am
    Permalink

    Moses,
    in supporting capitalism which is totalitarian and the antithesis of democracy and in your support of the U.S oligarchic government which is also totalitarian in its top-down rule, YOU oppose democracy .
    Anarchy, the philosophy/system to which I subscribe is democratic at its center . It rejects all governments as ultimately undemocratic and is based on bottom-up democracy.
    Do please attempt to reconcile these obvious contradictions for me.
    Are you NOT a totalitarian ?
    Am I not opposed to the totalitarian forms to which you subscribe ?
    Am I not, as an anarchist, a democrat in the precise meaning of the word ? ?

  • January 10, 2014 at 1:15 pm
    Permalink

    My favorite Churchill quote (assuming he really said it) is “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.” I wonder if your buddy JG can understand that.

  • January 10, 2014 at 1:05 pm
    Permalink

    OK, Johnnie, I’ll take the bait. If not Haiti, what two or three countries in your opinion should be compared to Cuba?

  • January 10, 2014 at 11:44 am
    Permalink

    I am aware of the limitations of the US electoral system. but this blog is called Havana Times. I prefer to discuss the topic of Cuba. For some reason, no matter the subject of the essay posted by the Cuban writers, you veer off straight for another round of bashing the USA.

    As Winston Churchill once said, “A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.”

  • January 10, 2014 at 11:04 am
    Permalink

    Universal single-payer healthcare is socialism or communism as defined by the moron right in the U.S.
    It’s nice to see you exhibit eminent sense on this one issue.
    OOPS! I just read what you wrote about the high U.S corporate tax rate driving jobs overseas …tsk tsk tsk .
    The EFFECTIVE corporate tax rate : the rate at which those taxes are actually paid is the lowest in decades at 14% while the official rate is 35% and NO corporation pays that.
    Second: Even were U.S. manufacturers to pay NO taxes , they could not compete with Chinese workers who are paid far, far less than what even minimum wage workers MUST be paid in the U.S. .
    67% of all new jobs created in the U.S ARE minimum wage jobs .
    The only logical next step would be a return to slavery except in those days they had to provide the slaves with food and shelter to keep them healthy enough to work which the wealthy of today are unwilling to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *