Veronica Vega

A difficult purchase.  Photo: Juan Suarez
A difficult purchase. Photo: Juan Suarez

HAVANA TIMES – When the decades of the 70s and 80s in Cuba are termed the “innocent years”, I can’t help feeling a passing shadow, remembering the official “repudiation” of those who had the courage to confess that they didn’t feel satisfied with the shared poverty nor with the simulation of freedom.

Confronted with the above viewpoint, I also find it hard to believe that the balance of isolation and lack of information regarding the standard of living that existed merely ninety miles away for example, could precisely be termed candidness, much less integrity.

When I say that I’m grateful for the poverty I grew up in because it served to activate my sensitivity and my imagination, I don’t pretend to deny the fact that others (I don’t know if they number in the hundreds or in the thousands), might feel altogether differently. For that reason,

I insist that a simple lifestyle is only useful if it’s chosen or accepted with joy.

At times I find myself wondering what Cuba might have been like if the poverty had been really equitable; if the same people who preached simplicity and abnegation had been and still were living examples of what they postulated. Possibly we wouldn’t have gotten very far in terms of technology (as we haven’t, in any case), but how much confusion and grief might have been avoided. How serene our children and youth would have been, how pure and decent..!

If the voracious drive for power and thought control hadn’t been behind the effervescent and massive idealism, it would never have had to be repressed; quite simply, those who weren’t in agreement would have been allowed to leave, under the basic premise that leaving or staying was an exercise of total freedom, and that those who wanted to construct that “ideal” society constituted the majority.

Amid today’s generalized current compulsion for prosperity, following decades of sacrifice and waiting, there’s a strong dose of vengeance and rebellion, in addition to the pendulum effect that impels us towards the other extreme.

Ditches.  Photo: Juan Suarez
Ditches. Photo: Juan Suarez

I recall that I once was describing enthusiastically to my mother some furniture that I had seen in the “shopping” center. She replied indifferently, “all that and better was available when I was a young girl (before the Revolution)”. The comparison with the past, uncomfortable in itself, becomes worse in this case because it invalidates everything which was at one time believed. One of the most palpable demonstrations of the fiasco can be seen right now in the recently legalized real estate market: to guarantee the maximum quality of a home, it has to have been constructed “before 1959”.

We could content ourselves with the idea that what we lived through was a dream if the panorama around us weren’t so desolate: blocks of houses on the edge of collapsing, sidewalks and streets that haven’t been repaired for decades; growing islands of rubbish; entire neighborhoods without proper sewers or streetlights, depressing schools and hospitals, multitudes who see vulgarity and brute force as legitimate.

A dream implies that we can wake up and find the original scenery intact. And how can we justify, in addition the two faces (inside and out); the bitter hatred and the fragmented thought of Cubans that can’t be called plurality?

During the nineties, some tourists once asked me if I believed that there was spiritual misery in Cuba. Without a lot of thought, I answered “yes”. Later I realized that this reply constituted the negation of what I had believed in my early childhood and youth: that the poverty we lived in was a momentary reality in a process of justice.

Mortadella on the ration booklet. Foto: Juan Suarez.
Mortadella on the ration booklet. Foto: Juan Suarez.

Exemplary figures such as the first Franciscan monks; the Clarissas, the order founded by Santa Teresa of Avila; the Jesuits and the Dominicans; and oriental mystics or political figures such as Mahatma Gandhi have taught us that material poverty isn’t the cause of moral degradation. The driving force for corruption is always our mentality. There’s a telling phrase whose author I don’t recall: “Kingdoms perish as a result of their own internal decomposition before other kingdoms invade them.”

I believe in the natural need for economic and technological betterment, but I’m convinced that no kind of development is sustainable over time if it’s not founded on an interest in the common good and consequently on the practice of kindness.

Socialism (or at least what has been seen as such in the 20th and 21st centuries) has shown itself to be as inefficient a social project as is neoliberalism. The former hasn’t been as globally damaging in the ecological sense, except in the case of China, but both have been equally destructive in the ethical sense” – they have devastated the spiritual consciousness of people.

Nonetheless, we were born to do good, no matter how many centuries or millenniums it takes the different societies to agree on this. It’s the only possible future. Despite how much we are impressed by the viability, the velocity and the far reach of technology, we can’t challenge the unforeseeable power of nature, the will that activates the great catastrophes, before which we scatter like terrified insects.

Poverty and wealth are two sides of a single road, where the mystery continues to be the future, and uncertainty the next step.


Veronica Vega

Veronica Vega: I believe that truth has power and the word can and should be an extension of the truth. I think that is also the role of Art and the media. I consider myself an artist, but above all, a seeker and defender of the Truth as an essential element of what sustains human existence and consciousness. I believe that Cuba can and must change and that websites like Havana Times contribute to that necessary change.

16 thoughts on “Cubans and the Advantages of Being Poor (II)

  • How childlike can you get Mr. Goodrich? Your response in describing me as a gullible fool exposes a pathetic inability to pursue logic. I not interested in the slightest in discussing anarchism. That belongs in the gutter press.
    I contribute to these discussions because I am supportive of Cuba and the Cuban people whom I love and “Socialismo” being non-democratic, has proven to be contrary to their best interests. I understand that it is impossible for you to know never having been there.
    The executions without trial carried out at El Morro and Santiago de Cuba by Ernesto Guevara and Raul Castro Ruz respectively were following the revolution, not during it!
    In the free country to the north of your own, political contributions are limited by law. No individual and no company can contribute more than $1,200 per annum and those contributions have to be recorded in annual tax returns. Not all countries are as gullible or foolish as the US.
    Don’t prostitute yourself by describing those with whom you disagree as “pimps”. You bring no credit upon yourself but merely indicate a lack of maturity.

  • Veronica is Cuba Public Enemy Number 1, whoever promote
    poverty in Cuba is an enemy of Cuba. Irresponsible writer, she should address
    her reflexions in private to her family not to the wider audience. These people can make
    so much damage, the last thing that Cuba needs.

  • You missed the point of my question. The Soviet economy collapsed over twenty years ago.

  • In short, BITE ME!.
    You support the liberation of the Cuban people , ?
    How, by being a mouthpiece , a pimp for an imperialist U.S. foreign policy ?
    That policy has attempted the overthrow of over 60 governments and some 30 nationalist /populist movements worldwide.
    I was being sarcastic when I ,mentioned that Che slept with a copy of “Mein Kampff” since the corporate media of the USA and extreme right wingers have, in the past , as a policy stated that people like Hugo Chavez and Fidel actually sleep with a copy under their pillows and gullible fools like yourself actually believe this trash.
    I am amazed to discover that during the Cuban revolution a big bunch of people were killed without trials .
    I could tell you that in all other violent revolutions, every miscreant from the overthrown governments were given rooms at the Ritz-Carlton and then a fair trial and released but you’d likely believe that as well.
    Since you are fairly new here I need explain that I am an anarchist which means my beliefs are founded and centered upon democracy which you must necessarily oppose since you support capitalism .
    I oppose the governmental form of Cuba but will support it in the face of U.S. imperial aggression and until that aggression ceases as is the principled thing to do.
    You have to make a decision as to whether you are for democracy or for capitalism .
    You cannot be for both and were Cuba to reintroduce capitalism, all hope for a democratic society would be lost .
    A last note: given that almost all bourgeois (capitalist) democracies are largely controlled by the wealthy , it matters little if there are many parties, one party or no parties at all.
    In the USA all candidates for national office are vetted and pre-selected by the very wealthy, those without whose money no one can win a national election and in the end we are allowed to vote for only those people .
    Any of those people, once elected, serve the needs and wants of their backers before the needs of the electorate and often in complete opposition of the will of the electorate.
    So please don’t speak to me of the need for multi-party electoral systems . They are ultimately totalitarian because of how they are financed .
    The best party is NO party and an electoral system based upon one-(wo)man -one vote and a government ( until rendered unnecessary ) of individuals who truly represent the will of the electorate.
    The above is part of my anarchist belief set and I am perfectly willing to debate any facet of that belief set once you learn what anarchism is .
    It is not Marxist, it is not Leninist, it is not Stalinist ,it is not Maoist, it is not Fidelista
    It is the essence of democracy .
    Lastly, you must understand that the alternative the USA is attempting to impose upon ( admittedly undemocratic )Cuba and the world (totalitarian capitalism) is worse and is the original cause of most revolutions .
    .

  • It’s cowboy capitalism .
    It’s power and money at its worst.
    The few fabulously wealthy, the great many in poverty equaled only in the days of the czars.
    But then, the Soviets/Russians always lived under dictatorships so the absolute dictatorship that capitalism is , is as familiar and expected as was Stalinism.
    Given the even more totalitarian government of the Russians (compared with the USA,) the rich-poor divide in that country will increase to the point that another revolution becomes necessary. IMO.
    My futurist outlook also sees the collapse of capitalism in about 15 years so, either way the Russians don’t have that long to wait for massive social change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *