The Beginning of the End of Cuba’s Dual Currency? (I)

Dmitri Prieto

HAVANA TIMES — A few days ago I was surprised by a sign posted in a chopin (a hard-currency store) in my neighborhood. It was located right next to the register (as well as next to the store entrance, as I realized later).

It’s a truism that two currencies circulate in Cuba.

Perhaps the most pathetic corollary of this fact is that the dual currency — more than representing inequality with regard to the access to foreign currency (generated from remittances, tourism, the mixed sector, work contracts and travel abroad) — conceals rampant income inequality.

While it’s possible to purchase convertible pesos with national currency pesos, the true complication is being able to get enough money (either in convertible pesos or “national” pesos) to meet one’s personal or family needs (whether basic or not).

The poster in question announced that people holding RED system magnetic debit cards could use these in that chopin to pay for purchases in local currency, of course at the officially established exchange rate.

The RED system operates for three Cuban banks (Banco Popular de Ahorro, Credito y Comercio, and Banco Metropolitano), which issue debit cards for accounts into which the wages of Cuban workers in some sectors are deposited (with these salaries being paid in local currency, of course).

There still aren’t many ATMs in Cuba, and very few stores have terminals where you can use those debit cards in local currency* (actually, I don’t recall having seen any).

So I was surprised by that poster in the store. In addition to expanding the use of these cards, it threatens to break one of our “psychological barriers,” one that is even more rooted in the Cuban system today.

This barrier is the tacit acknowledgment that there exists the possibility of buying goods in a chopin with the “money from one’s wages” (of course, only if you have a RED card).
* Magnetic cards are not always viewed as “conveniences,” because the vast majority of products and services are paid for in cash, and these debit card holders often have to wait in long lines to withdraw their money.

Dimitri Prieto-Samsonov

Dmitri Prieto-Samsonov: I define myself as being either Cuban-Russian or Russian-Cuban, indiscriminately. I was born in Moscow in 1972 of a Russian mother and a Cuban father. I lived in the USSR until I was 13, although I was already familiar with Cuba-- where we would take our vacation almost every year. I currently live on the fifth floor of an apartment building in Santa Cruz del Norte, near the sea. I’ve studied biochemistry and law in Havana and anthropology in London. I’ve written about molecular biology, philosophy and anarchism, although I enjoy reading more than writing. I am currently teaching in the Agrarian University of Havana. I believe in God and in the possibility of a free society. Together with other people, that’s what we’re into: breaking down walls and routines.

9 thoughts on “The Beginning of the End of Cuba’s Dual Currency? (I)

  • September 4, 2012 at 5:32 am

    ‘Moses’ writes he purposefully stated the “US is indeed trying to put pressure on the Cuban [government] through the embargo. This is US policy.”

    We need to write no further about US perfidy. Does anyone, anywhere, welcome US interference in internal policy in their country? I think not. The arrogance of Americans in thinking they can control the world seems to have no bounds. They were able to get away with it when the world perceived they were the good guys. It seems they are unaware that has changed. ‘Moses’ myopia in regard to the reality outside the US dysfunctional bubble is on display and he obviously hasn’t a clue, or pretends he doesn’t.

    My experience with Americans, a view shared by most who I talk to from both the left and right of the political spectrum, is they live in a fantasy world of their own making, created by the elites and pressure groups in their country who employ the trillion-dollar marketing industry to create the ‘reality’ they want.

    ‘Moses’ would have us believe failing “sales abroad are only tangentially related to pressures from the embargo”. But he wrote earlier the US is trying to put pressure on Cuba with the embargo. Is it then insanely maintaining a failed policy for 50 years? He may live in a fantasy world but even fantasies have a plot line.

    ‘Moses’ posits there is “a mindset that everything that is bad [in] Cuba is a result of the embargo.” If there is, then eliminating an ineffectual failed policy, in place for 50 years, would take care of that wouldn’t it? Logic is not a hallmark of fantasies, it seems.

    ‘Moses’ writes that “In no other country on the planet are citizens paid in one currency and forced to buy most of the products they need to live in another currency,” missing that I wrote that China also had two currencies at one time.

    It was a temporary measure as is Cuba’s. Dual currencies address economic problems and will never be popular. Keep in mind that ‘Moses’ is admitting the tightening of the US embargo was the immediate impetus for establishing the CUC system so the US is complicit in creating the dual monetary system. ‘Moses’ continues to poke a stick in the CUC sore that his country is responsible for creating.

    ‘Moses’ demonstrates his own lack of travel experience and challenged thinking when he claims it’s obvious I’ve never been to Cuba when I wrote that Cuba, in common with all tourist destination countries, had a de facto dual currency system – the US dollar and the local currency. Cuba simply formalized it by fixing the exchange rate, thus eliminating black market exchanges. The CUC was the mechanism for doing this.

    ‘Moses’ compares Jamaica to Cuba, ignoring a glaring difference. The US has never instituted or ‘tightened’ an economic embargo against Jamaica. We could either suggest it does so, in order to make a valid comparison, or more logically, wait for the US to end its insane Cuban embargo.

    In common with people who perpetrate horrendous crimes, ‘Moses’ writes that he is “illuminating the truth”, even if it makes him “less than a nice guy.” We have just seen a vivid example of this thinking, spoken by a mass murderer at his trial in Norway.

    I’m not suggesting in any way that as an individual ‘Moses’ falls in this category, but people who propagandize on behalf of a country whose policies are responsible for crimes that make the Norway murderer look like a rank amateur, excusing what they are doing by stating they are “illuminating the truth”, is the basis for most crimes against humanity that have been perpetrated throughout human history.

    The lesson seems to be quite obvious, at least outside the capitalist bubble of magical thinking. Eliminate the embargo and the CUC will disappear. Even ‘Moses’ has admitted this, unknowingly of course.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *