Erasmo Calzadilla 

At the end of July, Human Rights Watch (HRW) was news in Cuba again. The non-governmental organization questioned the Obama administration for not legally prosecuting George W. Bush and other high officials associated with him.  The crime?  War crimes and torture carried out under his command in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

What did “our” media do? 

The Cuban press reported on that news as if nothing had ever before been mentioned about HRW here.

Nevertheless only one year ago this same organization was news in Cuba after the presentation of a report (A New Castro, the Same Cuba. Political Prisoners in the Post-Fidel Era. November 2009) decrying an increase in repression against opponents of the Raul Castro government.

In response to the report, the official Granma newspaper (of November 19, 2009) published an article by Juan Diego Nusa Peñalver denying the statements by HRW.  Moreover, the paper went on the offense in its own defense:

“Like this, turning to science fiction [referring to HRW], and with its eternal disguise of a non-governmental organization…”   

“HRW, with the genuflecting of Jose Miguel Vivanco as its director, is the doer of evil against all that smells of independence…”   

“The subordination of HRW to Yankee politics is of such a nature…”   

“The United States cannot break willpower by way of pressure, not even with the servile collaboration of organizations like HRW.  

“HRW knows, despite its apparent dependence on Yankee imperial policies …”   

I’m not putting my hands in the fire for HRW for the simple reason that I’m not that familiar with it; but it seems to be anything but an organization that genuflects, given the manner in which it faces and questions the most abhorrent individuals and institutions (including the CIA) of the most powerful empire in the world.

And if it’s not “pro-Yankee,” the sole argument wielded by the spokespersons of the Cuban regime falls on its face, strengthening HRW’s report claiming repression against the dissidents.

Since 2009 there have occurred very favorable events in the human rights environment here, such as the release of those arrested during the “Black Spring” crackdown (2003).  Notwithstanding, the legal, police, political, and mental scaffolding that led to those regrettable acts remain intact.

Thus there is nothing to prevent another round-up of opposition members.  That’s why, and because I find it more credible now, I’ll keep my eye out for future HRW reports.

 


Erasmo Calzadilla

Erasmo Calzadilla: I find it difficult to introduce myself in public. I've tried many times but it doesn’t flow. I’m more less how I appear in my posts, add some unpresentable qualities and stir; that should do for a first approach. If you want to dig a little deeper, ask me for an appointment and wait for a reply.

3 thoughts on “HRW’s Credibility Seen from Cuba

  • Great article, Erasmo. The same opportunistic attitude is in full swing by British apologists for the Cuban regime over Amnesty International (AI). AI gets frequently quoted over the Miami Five – even though AI has never declared them prisoners of conscience. it has simply quetsioned the fairness of the legal procedures. In May 2009 Brendan Barber, the general secretary of the British Trades Union Congres while visiting Havana quoted AI on the case of the Miami Five. He conveniently forgot to mention that Amnesty International is illegal in Cuba, has for many years been refused access to Cuban prisons and at the time still listed over 70 prisoners of conscience in Cuba.
    At the same time, major British trade unions are affliated to the Cuba Solidarity Campaign, which is a mouthpiece of the Cuban government. At the same time British trade unions favour a boycott of Israel, where Amnesty International is free to operate and criticise their own government. Hypocrisy!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *