Cuba Likely Focus of US Firm’s 7-Figure Anti-Censorship Contract

By Tracey Eaton (alongthemalecon.blogspot.com)

the ultrasurf logo.
the ultrasurf logo.

HAVANA TIMES — The Broadcasting Board of Governors (a US Federal agency) earlier this month signed a $2,291,666 contract with the maker of Ultrasurf, touted as “one of the world’s most popular anti-censorship, pro-privacy” computer programs.

Ultrareach Internet Corp., based in Cheyenne, Wyo., created Ultrasurf to help Internet users in China defeat censorship and surf the Web anonymously.

BBG’s contract records available online do not mention Cuba or disclose what countries the agency is targeting. However, Cuba has been a focus of the agency’s Internet Anti-Censorship Division, or IAC.

A 2013 BBG fact sheet on Internet censorship says the agency has provided Ultrareach’s “anti-censorship, pro-privacy software to users worldwide who are subject to foreign government sponsored Internet censorship.”

The fact sheet said the IAC: “provides a variety of tools to circumvent filtering and promote Internet freedom for citizens of countries whose governments censor their access. The Division works closely with BBG broadcasters who target censoring countries to ensure access to their content and educate their audience about Internet censorship and safely circumventing filters.”

The document also states: “In an effort to promote potential future program growth, BBG studies and tests Internet circumvention tools beyond those currently funded.”

Evaluation of IAC tools is ongoing and an essential component of maintaining effectiveness and agility in the ongoing cat-and-mouse game of Internet censorship.
The IAC has worked with Ultrareach to improve the security of their Ultrasurf censorship circumvention client software.

The BBG has awarded Ultrareach a total of $4,699,999.92 in contracts for “custom computer programming services” since May 20, 2013.

The agency signed the nearly $2.3 million contract on June 4. Ultrareach expects to finish its work by June 10, 2016.

9 thoughts on “Cuba Likely Focus of US Firm’s 7-Figure Anti-Censorship Contract

  • So censorship of the internet will prevent half-baked invasions or attacks on airlines by disgruntled exiles? Do you really believe the Internet is that dangerous?

  • I didn’t need a history lesson. Looking forward is far more important. I will accept the inevitable biological solution as warmly as a political solution. Either way, no Castros. Post-Castro Cuba, I suspect, will be a very different country. The political calculus will warrant a very different strategy. Finally, to your comment regarding the success of the embargo. No one debates that it failed to achieve it’s original purpose. What is debatable is the impact of embargo on the Castros ability to foment revolution elsewhere around the world and in particular in Latin America.

  • So that fear is why A Cuban can’t access foreign news services in Spain….fear it will bring about a Bay of Pigs event?

  • Moses, that’s another of your fair, unbiased opinions concerning “The truth” about Cuba. For the Castro’s “to leave town…it can’t be from external actions. It must come from the Cuban people themselves.” Raul is almost 84; Fidel is almost 89. The “external” efforts to eliminate them has cost the U. S. democracy lots of prestige and the U. S. taxpayers billions of dollars while enriching benefactors by billions of dollars. I think it is obvious that old-age mortality will soon be a factor in the demise of the Castros, not “external” efforts nor “the Cuban people themselves.” Do you really think, Moses, there are sane people who actually believe your rants, such as “it must come from the Cuban people themselves.” I believe most of us have read, on the U. S. Security Archive website, the declassified U. S. documents that, in 1962, initiated the embargo to starve and deprive the Cuban people to entice them to rise up and overthrow or kill Castro. Since then such undemocratic farces as Torricelli and Helms Burton have strengthened the embargo. Uh, has it worked, Moses? If not, why? Did it fail for basically the same reason the Bay of Pigs attack failed? I’m sure you can excuse anything since 1952 that has enriched a few Batistianos and Mafiosi by harming everyday Cubans on the island…all in the guise, since 1959, of “hurting Castro!” I bet, Moses, after the Castros die of old age, that “hurting Miguel Diaz-Canel” will not be nearly as lucrative as “hurting Castro” has been since 1959.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *