Ecuador’s Former President Correa Sentenced to 8-Years over Bribe Taking

Former Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa.  File photo

HAVANA TIMES – Ecuador’s former president Rafael Correa was tried in absentia and sentenced to eight years in prison on Tuesday after a court found that he and former vice president Jorge Glas were aware of bribery and responsible for a corruption network, reported dpa news.

Correa, Ecuador’s head of state between 2007 and 2017, was accused of involvement in an illegal scheme that saw politicians taking more than seven million dollars in bribes in exchange for lucrative public works contracts, prosecutors say.

Correa is currently living in self-imposed exile in Belgium and was not present in court. He has consistently rejected the charges. “That is all wrong. Nothing has been proven,” Correa tweeted on Tuesday. 

The court’s decision can be appealed. 

During his term as president, Correa had ensured a phase of political stability and social progress. Through state-organized exploitation of resources, especially oil production, he succeeded in helping numerous people out of poverty and giving them access to education. He also expanded the infrastructure of the South American country.

Critics accused him of authoritarian tendencies, however. After the end of his term of office, he fell out with his former vice president, the current head of state Lenin Moreno. 

Correa was an important ally of Cuban leaders Fidel and later Raul Castro and Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela as well as Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua.  Under Moreno, Ecuador has distanced the country from those leaders.

 

2 thoughts on “Ecuador’s Former President Correa Sentenced to 8-Years over Bribe Taking

  • A nicely succinct analyse Moses.

  • Correa, unlike his other South American socialist leaders who led the failed progressive movement that swept across the southern hemisphere after the turn of the century, was educated in the US. He speaks near perfect English and was during his early political career, a full-on capitalist. His shift to the left has and should be seen as opportunistic. So, it is no surprise that he was, like so many of his cohorts, basically just another corrupt politician who took what he could from the system.

Comments are closed.