Supreme Court of Brazil Rules Lula to Remain in Prison

By Sinikka Tarvainen, dpa

Demonstrators protest in front of the Justice Ministry in Brasilia calling for the release of former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and the arrest of Brazil’s justice minister on June 10, 2019. (AFP/Evaristo Sa)

HAVANA TIMES – Brazil’s top court on Tuesday rejected a request to release former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva following allegations that a judge cooperated with prosecutors to jail him on corruption charges.

Lula’s lawyers had requested his release and the cancellation of his verdict following the accusations against former judge Sergio Moro, who is currently defense minister.

The Supreme Federal Court did not yet start discussing the allegations themselves, but one of the judges proposed that it release Lula temporarily until the lawyers’ request is decided on.

The court rejected the proposal with 3 votes to 2.

Lula, 73, started serving a 12-year prison sentence in April 2018 after being found guilty of corruption and money-laundering in connection with the renovation of a beachside penthouse he was planning to buy.

An appeals court later reduced the sentence to 8 years and 10 months.

Lula’s lawyers asked the Supreme Federal Court to order his release following allegations that Moro violated the rules of impartiality while working as a judge and handling the case.

Text messages attributed to Moro and prosecutor Deltan Dallagnol show that the then-judge “offered strategic advice to prosecutors and passed on tips for new avenues of investigation,” according to the website The Intercept Brasil, which made them public.

The Supreme Federal Court on Tuesday also rejected a second request for Lula’s release, which objected to an earlier decision by one of its judges to deny an appeal lodged by the ex-president’s defense.

Lula’s imprisonment prevented him from the contesting last year’s presidential elections, which he had been expected to win, and opened the way for far-right candidate Jair Bolsonaro, who was sworn in as president on January 1.

Bolsonaro made Moro his justice minister. Moro denies improper conduct during the corruption investigation.

The corruption charges against Lula are linked to the massive Lava Jato graft scandal surrounding the state oil company Petrobras, in which dozens of entrepreneurs and politicians have been implicated.

A working-class president, Lula oversaw strong economic growth and falling inequality during his 2003-2011 rule. His social policies earned him soaring popularity ratings, even as concern grew about corruption in his government.

One thought on “Supreme Court of Brazil Rules Lula to Remain in Prison

  • Brazil’s contribution to corruption is massive, because Odebrecht a Brazilian company, is known to have used bribes of over $750 million predominantly in South American countries. Who and where were the recipients?
    Cuba was the beneficiary of some $5 billion provided by Brazil when Lula was President, to enable the development of Mariel, the port lying west of Havana to which a new railway line and highway were constructed in anticipation of economic development. For a couple of years Raul Castro took visiting political dignitaries on obligatory visits, but his ardour appeared to diminish as it became evident that the project was a rather damp squib with workers being shipped in daily to do 24 hour shifts, from as far as fifty miles away in a fleet of glossy coaches bearing ‘Mariel Project’ lettering.
    Odebrecht was involved in the development of Mariel and if corruption was not involved, it would have been almost unique for them. How significant was it when Lula’s successor and Head of the Board of Petrobras the Brazilian nationalized oil industry – also known to have been involved in corruption, along with Raul Castro, jointly opened the new port.
    Because surprise, surprise, GAESA was also heavily involved – to the extent that in her speech at the opening, Dilma Rouseff (her original Bulgarian name of Rusev was changed to a Latin sounding one) made specific mention of General Luis Alberto Rodriguez Callejas, Raul’s son-in-law, thanking him for his work.
    So if as usual Odebrecht used bribes to secure the contracted work – who I wonder was the beneficiary?
    Let us hope that the Court considering the bankruptcy of Odebrecht insists on being provided with a list of the recipients of all those bribes.

Comments are closed.