Cuba’s Trade Unions: What Are They Good For?

Fernando Ravsberg*

For decades, Cuba’s trade unions have limited themselves to handing out work incentives to members.
For decades, Cuba’s trade unions have limited themselves to handing out work incentives to members.

HAVANA TIMES — “Unions aren’t here to hand out hotel coupons as work incentives. We’re here to ensure we are paid decorous salaries and that our workers can go on vacation using their salaries, without having anyone give them these vacations as a gift,” a trade union delegate said the first day of the Congress of the Cuban Workers Association

To say that protecting the rights and wages of workers is the central role a trade union should play may strike some as stating the obvious. According to Cuban journalist Yohan Gonzalez, however, people in Cuba actually run the risk of forgetting “why and for what purpose the CTC was created.”

He adds that the workers federation fails “to represent and is cut off from the base.” At the locals, in fact, union leaders come to understandings with “company management in favor of personal interests and against the demands and needs of union members.” (1).

The strategy reminds me of the good-cop-bad-cop routine. While the management demands discipline and productivity, the union leadership decides which of its members will earn the right to buy an electrical appliance at subsidized prices or an inexpensive vacation at the beach.

The theoretical foundations of this trade union philosophy must be sought in the tenets of “real socialism.” After bringing all the means of production under State control and declaring them “the people’s property”, it would be a contradiction for the worker-owners to pressure management for wage improvements.

Those who are most to blame for Cuba’s economic inefficiency aren’t the workers but the bureaucrats who are unable to lead them.
Those who are most to blame for Cuba’s economic inefficiency aren’t the workers but the bureaucrats who are unable to lead them.

In that ideal world also built in Cuba, trade union activity was practically nullified. The Cuban Communist Party, which has a representative in every State company and members at all managerial positions around the country, is the one who defends the “strategic interests” of the humble.

What’s curious is that Karl Marx himself says that there are social classes with particular interests under socialism. Thus, the adulteration of unions left workers at a disadvantage, devoid of the crucial instrument needed to defend their rights.

The social damage was even more serious than that, as this undermined the counterweight that could have put a stop to bureaucratization. As early as 1884, Jose Marti had warned about the difficulties the people would encounter when it “confronted government officials united by common interests.” (2).

Despite the long history of Cuba’s trade union movement, many workers today do not feel represented by some of their leaders, which lack real power or settle under the wings of managers in search of the crumbs the bureaucracy is willing to give them.

The Challenge of Trade Unionism in Cuba

During the CTC congress, Cuban President Raul Castro announced that the only wages that would go up are those of health professionals, and that all other workers would have to wait for the country’s productivity to rise.

He explained that a raise in salaries without an increase in productivity leads to inflation. This may be true, but it is also true that Cuba’s economic inefficiency is not chiefly the fault of workers but of those who manage companies and head ministries.

Working conditions could improve dramatically if the fuel, food, vacation and trip expenses of management were rationalized, and if superiors were dismissed and forced to pay for the damages they caused, out of their own pockets, whenever they did anything stupid.

We are talking about a country where high transportation officials have the fuel and spare parts they need to keep their own, private and official cars rolling, while hundreds of buses idle in workshops for lack of spare parts.

The State spends truckloads of money to buy cutting-edge medical equipment to then let them collect dust at customs, because the hospitals that need them simply don’t send anyone to pick them up, denying cancer patients the treatment they need.

Many workplaces around Cuba have experienced a drop in salaries, not because of low productivity, but due to administrative inefficiency.
Many workplaces around Cuba have experienced a drop in salaries, not because of low productivity, but due to administrative inefficiency.

The election of Ulises Guilarte as the new chair of the CTC may herald changes. A young, pragmatic official, Guilarte enjoys the trust of the Cuban president. He was the official tasked with setting in motion the country’s political and administrative decentralization, a sensible and complex reform process.

The task ahead of him now is no less delicate – it goes beyond trade union matters and points towards the need to re-establish a system of counterweights that can balance society, empowering the productive sectors before the budding managerial class.

Trade unions aren’t only needed to check foreign investors and the self-employed alone; they are also indispensable to contain the appetites of government officials who, as Jose Marti warned (3), tend to constitute an autocratic and abusive class.

1) http://desdeminsulacuba.com/2014/02/24/y-para-que-sirve-la-ctc/

2), 3). The Complete Works of Jose Marti, Volume XV, pg. 391, Ciencias Sociales, Havana, 1991.
—–
(*) A Havana Times translation of the original published in Spanish by BBC Mundo.


6 thoughts on “Cuba’s Trade Unions: What Are They Good For?

  • March 18, 2016 at 4:59 pm
    Permalink

    As the trade unions are owned by the wealthy Castro family they are not trade unions.

    The Castro’s aim is control the people and enrich themselves, not to help workers.

    A trade union has to be independent from the state or it is not a trade union.

  • February 28, 2014 at 12:44 pm
    Permalink

    The history of the Cuban trade union movement is very interesting. They helped to overthrow Batista by organizing a general strike. But after the revolution, Castro recognized they represented a centre of power that must be brought under Party (ie. his) control.

    The purpose of the CTC is to represent and enforce the rule of the Party over workers.

    There is no evidence the Castro regime would improve the conditions of their rule over Cuba.

  • February 28, 2014 at 10:52 am
    Permalink

    Fidel was and is a Leninist . He believed in a cadre-led revolution because of the circumstances of illiteracy and historical precedence in Cuba .
    As did Trotsky and Lenin, Fidel and the PCC trashed the grass-roots democratic institutions to install top-down state -run economies and governments .
    Cuba is not a democratic nation .
    It is a state-run country that utilizes socialist -style distribution of essential goods and services along with a non-socialist totalitarian top-down organization to accomplish this.
    It is a mix of totalitarian and socialist practices.
    The U.S. , it must be acknowledged, also has both a totalitarian economic form (capitalism) and a de facto totalitarian government form ( oligarchy/plutocracy-rule of the rich and powerful) .
    What the U.S. does not have is Cuba’s equitable distribution of essential goods and services .
    Once the U.S. ends its economic and propaganda war against Cuba, there will be a great improvement in the lives of all Cubans .
    Things will change for the better in all aspects of Cuban life when that happens.

  • February 28, 2014 at 10:41 am
    Permalink

    That the unions are ineffective in Cuba should come as no surprise .
    Cuba has a top-down (totalitarian) economy AND government and so those at the bottom; the workers and the unions have no power.
    In the U.S. the totalitarian ( oligarchic/plutocratic ) government and totalitarian capitalism have also reduced union power- translated as democracy : bottom-up power – to single digit participation among workers as the forces of big business and government work to eliminate democratic labor movements as they have since the 50s.
    The solution in both cases is democracy .
    Given the power and violent intransigence of the .0001% in the U.S. , this is more unlikely than it is in Cuba where the bureaucracy and the PCC are more amenable to serving the needs of the public.
    Those who oppose unions in the U.S. should have no problem with the diminishing of union power in Cuba as they are totalitarian at heart, favoring the rule of the few .

  • February 28, 2014 at 5:31 am
    Permalink

    The real contradiction was when the State took ownership of everything and then declared the people are in control. To prove the lie, the State banned all individual rights and freedoms.

    In the last free election held by the Cuban labour federation, in late 1959, only 5% of the delegates were Communists and none of the elected executive were. This outcome so enraged Fidel he appointed a Communist as Minister of Labor. His assignment was to ash the independent trade unions and bring them under the control of the Party.

  • February 27, 2014 at 12:02 pm
    Permalink

    WEell said that man!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *