Esteban Morales

Barack Obama and Raul Castro two weeks ago at the funeral of Nelson Mandela on Tuesday. Photo: SABC

HAVANA TIMES — Though Raul Castro and Barack Obama’s recent greeting at Nelson Mandela’s funeral was merely a handshake – there was really no time for anything more elaborate – the gesture was no accident. That is, they meant it.

These things either happen or not, but they do not happen by chance. Either there is an express will to do it or it simply doesn’t happen. Coincidences cannot be prepared in advance or staged. Even if someone’s planned for such occurrences, no one dares go through with such gestures if the other party hasn’t expressed their agreement, much less if they don’t know whether they will reciprocate. No one likes to make a fool of themselves.

It wasn’t mere politeness either. The two countries have been in conflict for many years and, if one of the two leaders had decided not to greet the other, the handshake would quite simply not have taken place.

I don’t think there is any contradiction in the fact the two leaders greeted each other and that, now, Obama should have decided (if it was actually the President’s call) to impose a 100-million-dollar and 72-million-Euro fine on the Royal Bank of Scotland.

Quite simply, if the United States – or Obama in particular – saw the opportunity to do so, he really had no reason to play dumb or let it go. Obama has said he will keep the blockade in place and that’s how things are going to work, until the president decides on a different course of action.

There is also no contradiction in the fact the Semester at Sea cruise should have returned to Cuba after an 8-year travel prohibition, or that different tourism cruises should have begun to arrive at the island once again. All of this falls well within the Cuba policy which Obama has decided to follow since 2009.

The two countries are also holding talks about mail and migratory services. Students are also being granted permission to come to Cuba and there are periodic talks about the Guantanamo Naval Base aimed at preventing unpleasant incidents. As we say in Cuba, “you can be polite and brave at the same time.”

Are we really to believe that Obama’s gesture towards Raul Castro reveals that the United States’ aggressive policy towards Cuba will become more lenient?

There is no need for such speculation. Obama’s gesture, returned by Raul, is in keeping with the policy the US president has decided to follow vis-à-vis Cuba. It would be a mistake to jump to any conclusions and assume Obama’s handshake is a step beyond this policy.

What we should hope for is for Obama to clarify what he meant when he said in Miami that Cuba policy had to be “updated.” That statement, and what comes next, is worth our attention.

In the meantime, Cuba continues to strengthen its position and wait to see whether Obama’s greeting was a polite, friendly or hypocritical gesture.


50 thoughts on “The Significance of the Raul Castro-Obama Handshake

  • Posing a threat to America is not the the point, and you are in the wrong that the perceived threat is “based solely on communism as a political system.” If that was the case, the the U.S. would not have diplomatic relations with China, Vietnam, etc etc. Anywhere in the world where you have a one party system and all others can be incarcerated if they disagree with the “party line,” the citizens will not be able to exercise free will. The Cuban government does not have to adopt American style democracy, then can choose British or French style democracy :).

  • I agree with you to a point…but Cuba is not Hitler’s germany. Cuba is not Iraq or Iran or North Korea. Cuba is just this little island in the Caribbean that poses no threat to America at all. The perceived threat, however, is based solely on communism as a political system…AND the Cuban government’s stubborn refusal to adopt American style democracy.

  • I just saw the video when this happen, and all I see is that Obama was going to greet Dilma, and as a diplomatic gesture he just also greet Raul but was not really expecting any conversational situation with Castro…

  • No, it was not racist of African-Americans for voting for Obama. People support a given candidate for a number of reasons. African-Americans were already voting heavily for the Democratic Party. People also vote for candidates they can identify with, and it is perfectly reasonable for blacks to identify with a young black Senator from Chicago. Racism is about doing harm to somebody on the basis of their race. I doubt very few people voted against McCain, certainly not for his race. They were voting FOR Obama.

  • The economic system you quality with #1 and #2 in your comment has not and will not exist. Human beings will not avoid forming social groups which will morph into coalitions which will morph into political parties and then what do you have…TOTALITARIANISM. Castro pretended to be interested in everything you worship. Once in power, he quickly revealed his true face which is exactly what despots do. Your wacko notion that a society can exist ungoverned and that people will just blithely get along and support the one man/one vote democratic principal is worse than ignorant. Who really believes this sort of thing!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *