Ethical Dilemma: Should LGBTQ+ Resorts in Cuba Be Promoted?

HAVANA TIMES – For a long time, Quebec has been recognized for its progressive positions on LGBTQ+ rights, with a dynamic and prosperous community in the heart of Montreal’s “Gay Village”. However, recent events have led me to some ethical reflections about the posture of some of the aspiring LGBTQ+ businesses in the province, especially with respect to the promotion of resort vacations in Cuba.

The question at hand refers to the promotion of LGBTQ+ events and destinations in Cuba, like the popular “Pitbull” festival and the gay resorts there, on the part of Quebec’s LGBTQ+ organizations and businesses. At first glance, these initiatives may seem like a celebration of inclusion and diversity. Yet a deeper look reveals a complex ethical dilemma.

Cuba has undoubtedly advanced in the recognition of LGBTQ+ rights. The country has legalized same-sex marriage and has adopted some measures towards greater acceptance. Nonetheless, this apparent advance must be juxtaposed against a history of human rights abuses and restricted freedom of expression in the country. The Cuban government, previously known for its policy of persecuting LGBTQ+ individuals, is still in power, and the wounds from past injustices haven’t yet completely healed.

What makes the situation particularly problematic is the fact that the Cuban resorts promoted as LGBTQ+ friendly are mostly isolated from the rest of the country. They’re resorts directed primarily at tourists, and most of the income they generate goes to the government, which includes individuals associated with the past persecution of LGBTQ+ Cubans. To complicate things even more, the Cuban government hasn’t made meaningful efforts to compensate the families and individuals who have suffered from the discrimination and harassment of the past.

This situation poses a basic, but complex question: Is it ethically acceptable for the LGBTQ+ groups in Quebec that defend human rights and equality to promote tourism to Cuban resorts that economically benefit a regime with a problematic human rights history? The answer is far from simple.

Some would argue that the promotion of LGBTQ+ events and tourism in Cuba could lead to positive change and greater acceptance in the country. These people feel that dialogue within Cuban society can promote LGBTQ+ rights and trace a path towards reform. However, this perspective may well be too optimistic, given the isolation of these resorts and the lack of any significant political change within the Cuban government.

On the other hand, there are those who are deeply concerned about the indirect support such tourism brings to a regime responsible for past human rights abuses. They sustain that the ethical posture of the LGBTQ+ groups should be focused on holding governments accountable for their actions and promoting justice and compensation to those who have suffered. In conclusion, the promotion of LGBTQ+ events and resorts in Cuba on the part of some groups in Quebec presents a complex ethical dilemma. Although celebrating LGBTQ+ inclusion and diversity is essential, it’s also important to consider the broader implications of such promotions. This obligates us to take on the uncomfortable question of whether such initiatives really advance the cause of LGBTQ+ rights, or if they end up being a form of involuntary support for a regime with a history of human rights violations. It’s a question that deserves debate and ongoing discussion among those who value human rights and social justice. 

Read more from diary of Luis Rondon Paz here on Havana Times.

6 thoughts on “Ethical Dilemma: Should LGBTQ+ Resorts in Cuba Be Promoted?

  • Hola, I’ve been to this resort 2 times already. There are a few rich Cubans who come there as well. Also, they sometimes invite drag queens from Havana. When I went there for the first time they brought a full bus of LGBTQ folks from Havana and they stayed there for free for a few days. I’m not sure how much it’s “government” as supposed to Muthu hotel chain. I believe it’s like 50/50% ownership.

  • Stephen / Sylvian: sorry for my misnaming Canada’s First Nations people. My error.

  • Bob Michaels writes: “Canada, for their treatment of Second Nations people”

    Bob, the Aboriginal or Indigenous peoples of Canada definitely are not known as “Second Nations people”. They would be insulted to be characterized as such. If you you are aware of your Canadian history, the Aboriginal or Indigenous peoples were the original inhabitants in North America.

    It is the settlers from Europe and beyond who arrived on the North American shores and encountered these original peoples. So, the settlers and all their ancestors are Second Nations people and the Aboriginal or Indigenous people are rightly known as First Nations people. That’s right – First – not Second Nation people of Canada.

    I state this for your edification and to show some respect to First Nations people of Canada.

  • “Canada, for their treatment of Second Nations people“

    Did you know that today We have reconciliation day and ongoing everyday work to pay for the pain done to the natives ?

    Did you know that Canada it’s still paying a indemnisation to LGBT+ people who was persecuted and discriminated (even de Army) Google it:

    In other hand. LGBT entrepreneurs should be more consistent with their choice on who they do business. But of course it’s easy money, who does not like that ? Specially the lazy Canadians .

  • Do we make a list of countries we should not visit because because of their historical human rights abuses?

    US, just to show no bias but slavery is enough
    Spain, due to their centuries long attempts to take over the world by displacing locals
    France, ditto Spain
    Portugal, ditto
    United Kingdom, ditto
    Fiji Islands (also Peru) throwing virgins into the volcanoes
    Germany, WWI and WWII
    Canada, for their treatment of Second Nations people
    And, this list would include just about every country in the world

    I have homosexual friends in Cuba, happy well adjusted members of society. They encourage foreign visitors to help the economy. Don’t do them harm by staying home.

  • Only if the survival from the Gay’s concentration camp UMAP Can have free vacations in it with everything paid and a rounds of testimonials experience to the naive Canadian and theirs Mulatos lovers

Comments are closed.