Erasmo  Calzadilla

HAVANA TIMES — Till recently, school and repression were for me synonymous. At least, this is how I felt about Cuba’s educational system, which devotes arduous efforts to inculcate distorted values in you from the time you enter pre-school, urges you to follow in the footsteps of someone you don’t yet know from the first grade on, and, when you’re still a kid, forces you to join an organization that begins to train you for the fraud of a democracy you will live under later in life.

And the whole process is managed and legitimated by a whole army of high-level psychologists and pedagogues in the name of the common Good.

I was a university professor for a number of years and a high school teacher for some months. During this time, I never once heard anyone say anything about libertarian teaching methods. I met dissident teachers, disaffected teachers, teachers who didn’t give two shits about anything, students who were delinquents, students who were rebellious, unstable or alienated.

But I never came across anyone who was coherently and systematically in favor of any of the following principles:

  • Respect towards the psychological individuality of the child or youngster, of the kind that abhors emotional coercion and the inculcation of values.
  • Co-management of school affairs by the students, as a form of training in freedom and responsibility.
  • Condemnation of sexual repression and competitiveness.
Co-education.

The song by Pink Floyd where I found the title for this post had given me reason to think that, somewhere in the world, there had to be a movement opposed to traditional, repressive education. I was seeing a ray of hope, but didn’t know where it was coming from. Only many years later would I discover the libertarian pedagogy movement.

One of its founders had been the Spanish anarchist Francisco Ferrer y Guardia. Around 1901, in Barcelona, Ferrer y Guardia had founded the Modern School, an institution where children of both genders and of every social class (something revolutionary for the time) would learn at their own pace, through different games.

The initiative was so disturbing for the owners of the country’s spiritual monopoly at the time (the Church and State), that they led a war against Ferrer y Guardia and did not stop until he was lying dead in a mass grave somewhere.

Three of the martyr’s reflections can help us get a sense of what his enemies were so afraid of.

  •  “We have no fear to stress this: we want men and women who are capable of evolving constantly, who are able to constantly tear down and renew their environment and themselves, people whose intellectual independence becomes their chief driving force, who will never cling to anything, and who are always willing to welcome what’s best, happy to see the triumph of new ideas and who aspire to lead multiple lives in the span of one life. Society fears such people. We cannot, thus, expect it to ever want a system of education capable of producing them.”

    Francisco Ferrer y Guardia
    Francisco Ferrer y Guardia
  •  “Just as science admits no demonstration that isn’t supported by facts, so too is there no real education other than that which is free of all dogmatism, that which allows the child to direct his/her own efforts and only sets out to aid in this journey. There is nothing easier than altering this path and nothing harder than respecting it.”
  • “(…) may the student’s own intelligence, influenced only by what he or she sees and documents, aided by the positive knowledge he or she acquires, reason freely, without prejudices or any sectarian coercion of any sort, with full autonomy and with no other restrictions than those imposed by Reason itself.”

Fifty years later, in revolutionary Cuba, Ferrer y Guardia would not have been put before a firing squad, true, but he could well have been imprisoned or harassed. What’s certain is that he would never have been able to create a school or to publish anything that Fidel Castro could not agree with.


Erasmo Calzadilla

Erasmo Calzadilla: I find it difficult to introduce myself in public. I've tried many times but it doesn’t flow. I’m more less how I appear in my posts, add some unpresentable qualities and stir; that should do for a first approach. If you want to dig a little deeper, ask me for an appointment and wait for a reply.

4 thoughts on “We Don’t Need No Education

  • The Cuban educational system’s main purpose was indoctrination and preparation of a working force to work in the state capitalist economic system. It fed dogmatic incorrect information and tried to instill obedience in the children.
    Children were turned a against their own parents and encouraged to inform on them and others. In schools the children of dissidents and people that applied to emigrate were forced to denounce their parents or had to endure harrowing sessions of public humiliation.
    The regime even went as far as using children for its infamous acts of repudiation taking them out of school to mindlessly shout rehearsed insults at dissidents standing in front of their homes.
    Education was also part of the system of control in a broader sense: it could be denied to those that opposed the regime and their children. Parents were blackmailed with their children’s future. For medical education for example a recommendation from the CDR, the chivatos, was needed.
    The Cuban educational system was always flawed, but in recent years standards have been dropping in all fields and at all levels of education.
    Nobody wants to be a teacher any more and a shortage has developed. Teachers are demotivated by low pay. Bribes and gifts have become commonplace. Corruption is spreading. Teachers and educators are even involved in prostitution rings where they pimp their students.
    The infrastructure itself is crumbling. Schools are in various states of disrepair. teaching equipment is lacking and often stolen. VCR’s before and now computers are the prized goods stolen from schools.
    Cuban students are also unable to get access to the internet. The new internet cafés even do not allow people under 18.
    The 27 places drop of Cuba’s best university in Latin American rankings just illustrates the decay of the system. The fact that also only 53% of high school graduates pass the entrance tests for higher education is also a telltale sign.

    See (in Spanish)
    http://educacioncuba.blogspot.ca/

  • I’ll ignore the reactionary fodder that will inevitably come, but I’ll note that Guardia’s ideas were an inspiration for the ‘more famous’ Paulo Freire.

    I say this because even in education fantastic ideas can be ‘raped’ – Freire’s ‘continuing education’ principle was turned into ‘automatic school approval’ which is continually ‘forming’ 8th-grade functional analphabets here in SP.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *