Cuban Universities: Marxism-Leninism as a Terminal Disease
Yenisel Rodriguez Perez
HAVANA TIMES – The fact “Marxism-Leninism” continues to be included in the syllabi of Cuban universities reveals the divorce between the economic reforms impelled by the Castro government and the political discourse it holds up as banner.
The Marxism-Leninism taught at our universities is one of the many versions of this theory that emerged from an apocryphal edition of Marxist thought, carried out under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which was combined by Lenin’s so-called contributions to Marxism.
This has led to some truly absurd situations at university classrooms. Let us consider, for instance, what takes place within the Economics program. This program must inculcate future economists with the anti-capitalist views of Marxism-Leninism while simultaneously train them to become neoliberal technocrats.
Can you imagine something crazier?
The version of Marxist-Leninist theory in circulation today is a homemade manual that attempts to update the ideological legacy of the Soviet regime and adapt it to Cuban reality at the close of the 20th century.
In other words, an attempt to update a theory which, at the time of publication, was collapsing across Eurasia and brining the entire socio-economic model of the socialist bloc down with it.
As though this weren’t enough, they would use such an updated Marxism-Leninism to confront a crisis caused by that very model.
It is so absurd that even the laziest student ends up realizing how insolent his Marxist-Leninist professors ultimately are.
A few days ago, a high-school student on the same bus I was traveling in had a blast analyzing the behavior of the driver using his Marxist-Leninist manual:
“Look at that, our driver friend is materializing labor with the bus, he’s razing the dialectics to the ground, that is true antithesis and a clear illustration of the class struggle.”
The absolute loss of autonomy by universities over more than 50 years has made all Cuban schools subordinate to a form of pedagogy that recalls medieval scholastics, a system further constrained by the iron-fisted political control maintained by the Young Communists League.
This situation annuls the possibility of any novel academic proposal and does away with creative freedom and any student criticism.
Beyond the inevitable fraternity spawned by their co-existence with classmates and professors, students end up silently rejecting this academic environment. This attitude makes Cuban universities graveyards, brimming with architectural elements celebrating knowledge and the arts and utterly devoid of academic culture and intellectual enthusiasm.
If this pseudo-scientific stratagem, which lost its political usefulness decades ago, continues to be taught at Cuban universities today, it is because of the monopoly of the educational system maintained by the Cuban Communist Party.
This has all been part of the regime’s political strategy: the control over public spaces and the daily life of Cubans. This way, universities have been part of the map of communist domination, emptied of life experiencies and a genuine gregarious culture.
This has been the case with numberless popular institutions, such as traditional festivities, neighborhood or professional associations, the freedom of assembly and many others. All have been dismembered and forced to recycle the political discourse that sustains a sense of belonging to the dominant imaginary.
This is why I consider any act of student sabotage vis-a-vis Marxism-Leninism a conscious or unwitting popular action against the authoritarianism and demagogy of the government and academy.
I never miss an opportunity to support or lead any initiative against doctrinaire education. Which is why I joined the performance offered by that high school student on the bus, when I claimed to discover the concept of “negation of the negation” in the sudden stops made by the driver.
7 thoughts on “Cuban Universities: Marxism-Leninism as a Terminal Disease”
Thanks for the article. I wanted to learn more about Marxism-Leninism from a Cuban perspective and this article provides a photograph of the manual which helped me locate and acquire one so I can read it. Gracias. You help me further my learning of communism.
There is a parallel situation in the West where technocratic neo-liberal economics is taught unquestionably in the universities, despite its recent failure in the credit crunch. Everything else, from Marx to even Keynes and much more is excluded. The following taken from the following article: “Students can now complete a degree in economics without having been exposed to the theories of Keynes, Marx or Minsky, and without having learned about the Great Depression” http://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/nov/18/academics-back-student-protests-neoclassical-economics-teaching Despite the supposed overhaul mentioned in the article, my economist friends tell me that little has changed.
I have never met a Marxist who was not a dogmatic ideologue. You make the common mistake of trying to blame what went wrong in the USSR on Stalin’s “excesses”. It began with Lenin who applied his dogmatic version of Marxism as a totalitarian ideology. Stalin was not a deviation, but the logical conclusion of the system Lenin founded.
No doubt Marxist ideas can be presented in a deadly and boring way. but they can also be engaging and exciting. Two writers who come to mind are Ernest Mandel and Daniel Bensaid. No doubt there are many others. Eg. Rosa Luxembourg and CLR James. Check them out
Why should any single theory of society be an ‘official’ one? Let there be classes in Marxism, in free market economics, in Keynsianism, ideally taught by believers in these systems. And since there is no single ‘Marxism’, or single interpretation of any other doctine, let the different currents within these schools of thought publish freely, debate with each other, and attempt to win adherents in open intellectual combat.
No other ‘science’ has to be enforced through police measures.
Do you want them to teach Ayn Rand, Hayek? Of course, there is a contradiction bet. Marxist-Leninism and the direction of the Cuban economy. “Socialism in one country” (in Cuba) was always impossible. Marx-Leninism is internationalist, but it is not a dogma, though the Stalinists treated like dogma.
Marxist-Leninist economic theory should be taught in history classes, along with feudalism and nercantilism. But to present Marxist-Leninist theory in contemporary economic studies is ridiculous. The same professor who teaches this class during the day is likely selling clothes from Belize out the back door at night. The hypocrisy of the Castro revolution never fails to amaze.
Comments are closed.