Dawn Gable

Havana International Airport.  Photo: Caridad
Havana International Airport. Photo: Caridad

HAVANA TIMES, Nov. 20 – Yesterday the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing regarding a bill (HR 874) that would lift the ban on US citizens’ right to travel to Cuba. The hearing, originally scheduled to run two hours stretched from 10am to 2pm, with spectators beginning to line up for seats well before 7am.

Tensions were high as the committee includes the most fervent supporters of normalization of relations with Cuba on the one side: Rep. Jeff Flake and Rep. Delahunt, who are the authors of the so-called “travel for all” bill; Rep. Barbara Lee; Rep. Meeks etc., and on the other side the most rabid opponents, Rep. Ros-Lehtinen, Albio Sires, Connie Mack, Rep. Dan Burton, and Rep. Christopher Smith.

In opening remarks, the supporters of lifting the ban stuck to arguments of the rights of US citizens to freely travel wherever they choose, pointing out that Cuba is the only country in the world where they cannot travel.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen hurls accusations Thursday against those opposing the travel ban while holding her enemies’ stickers in her hand.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen hurls accusations Thursday against those opposing the travel ban while holding her enemies’ stickers in her hand.

These congress people argued that the issue at hand is not the current conditions of human rights in Cuba but rather the status of civil rights in a free nation that is currently applying a discriminatory law that allows a segment of the US population (Cuban-Americans) to travel to Cuba while prohibiting others.

They posed that predicating further engagement with the island’s people on gestures of good-will from the Cuban leadership effectively cedes power to a foreign government over the rights of US citizens.

Unfortunately the opposition barely mentioned travel at all.  They chose to denounce the Cuban government regarding political prisoners and human rights abuses.

Each offered as an example, Yoani Sanchez’ recent claim that she was detained and injured by Cuban security agents.  However, they effectively ignored the statement that Yoani herself sent to the hearing and that the Chairman of the committee read aloud in which the blogger called for the travel ban to be lifted.

Similarly they discounted the testimony of Miriam Leiva, founder of Las Damas de Blanco and wife of a former political prisoner who joined the hearing via video conference from the US Interest Section in Havana.

She affirmed that the dissident community, as well as most political prisoners, wants unfettered travel by US Americans to Cuba. They see people-to-people engagement as a way of introducing new ideas and providing support for change.

They also feel increased presence of US Americans will lead to improvements in human rights conditions in Cuba and the travel dollars they bring will boost the economic situation of the Cuban people.

Travel dollars, she assured, make it into the hands of average Cubans through art and craft sales, room rentals, in-home restaurants, taxis, tips, farmers markets etc. thus making the Cuban people less reliant on the Cuban government to make ends meet.

Which side came out of this hearing ahead depends on how you score it. If scored by strength of objective and rational argument for opening travel to Cuba, the pro-travel side won hands down.  If scored by emotional button pushing, loudness of voice, redness of face, and who took the role of defense and who played the role of offense, the right-wing Cubans come out far ahead.


5 thoughts on “Cuba Travel Ban Lines Drawn

  • The US government is dictating the travel ability of their citizens (to Cuba) just as the Cuban government dictates travel for their citizens. How can the US act like it is more open-minded and democratic, when the situation is similar. Listen to the Cuban people and move past the outdated ego-trip legacy the US government is now choking on!

  • The issue is not score-keeping, winning or loosing, rather, it is taking a hard look at the powerful impact that these and other decisions had and continue to have on the life of millions of Cubans. It is immoral that this pack of wolfes, headed by the Ros-Lethinen/Diaz-Balart gang, who have inflicted unspeakable pain and suffering on the Cuban people, have the guts to speak on behalf of democracy, while denying American born citizens their right to travel, by no one other than NATURALIZED Americans, who claimed they are in this country, because their basic rights were denied under communism in Cuba. How Ironic!! Unable to inflict more pain on Cubans than what they did with the Torricelli/Helms-Burton Act, they are now turning on their benefactor, the United States. Cria Cuervos que te Sacaran Los Ojos or Raise Crow and they will Pluck out your Eyes!

  • As if elected fascists like Ros-Lehtinen or Mack care two figs about truth or justice. That’s the American Way.

    What’s truly pathetic here however, is that both wings of U.S. imperialism actually believe, deep down inside their shallow being, that the majority of cubans can simply be bribed out of their patrimony and future with what amounts to some assortment of baubles, trinkets, and other assorted bright, shiny objects casually thrown their way. I think they have another thing coming.

  • Do they ever have these kind of public debates (emotional, rational or otherwise) in the so-called National Assembly of Peoples Power on the right of Cubans to travel abroad? If so, I seemed to have missed it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *