US-Cuba Discuss Alan Gross & Fugitives

During Migratory Talks in Washington D.C.

Wilfredo Cancio Isla   (Café Fuerte)

Alex Lee, head of the US delegation.

HAVANA TIMES — Cuban and US representatives held a new round of migratory talks in Washington on Wednesday, reestablished on a quarterly basis in 2009, the US State Department has confirmed.

Though the central issue to be tackled during these talks is the fulfillment of the migratory agreements, a State Department spokesperson declared that the US delegation will express its concerns over the situation of contractor Alan Gross, the poor state of human rights in Cuba and the existence of fugitives from US justice who have taken refuge in Cuba.

It is no accident that, in its declarations concerning the resumption of these talks, the State Department should make mention of such issues as human rights and fugitives from US justice.

The case of Alan Gross, sentenced to 15 years in prison in Cuba, is the main source of friction between the two countries and has hindered progress towards more favorable bilateral relations under the Obama administration.

As for fugitives from US justice, the usual list of criminals sought by the FBI recently swelled with hundreds of individuals implicated in the Medicare fraud and other crimes who fled to the island.

Safe Migration

Cuba’s delegation is headed by Josefina Vidal Ferreiro, head of the United States Office of the Cuban Ministry of Foreign Relations (MINREX). In May, Vidal paid an unexpected visit to Washington and met with the Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Roberta Jacobson.

The US delegation is headed by the Deputy Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Alex Lee.

“The scheduled talks do not represent a change in US policy towards Cuba and are of a routine nature,” said a State Department spokesperson. “Continuing to ensure safe, legal and orderly migration between Cuba and the United States is in keeping with our interests of promoting greater freedom and greater respect towards human rights in Cuba.”

During Vidal’s visit in May, the two concurred that the Cuban and US governments “have publicly expressed their interest in normalizing relations through a gradual process, though no concrete steps have been seen for the moment.” The issues addressed by the two officials was not revealed on that occasion.

In the weeks that followed the meeting, however, tensions again began to characterize bilateral relations, after Washington kept Cuba on its annual list of nations that sponsor terrorism and the list of 23 countries with the most severe problems in terms of the trafficking of persons.


14 thoughts on “US-Cuba Discuss Alan Gross & Fugitives

  • Rehmat, you seem like an antisemite.

  • A detailed timetable for incremental changes on both sides would a good place to start. “You get this for that…and that for this”…a simple formula that needs to be entertained by both governments. But if your government takes on a demanding tone with expectations set in stone, I think one can further expect that very little will change at all. Acceptance of Cuba “as is” will be entirely necessary initially, and paramount to achieving success with your shopping list later.

  • Dear onbobel777! Here is one of the documents from an appeal by the Cuban 5 spies. I think you need to provide a link to something other than your word to have some credibility dear!

    FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    JUNE 4, 2008 – THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

    Five agents of the Cuban Directorate of Intelligence who were members of La Red Avispa (in English, “The Wasp Network”) challenge their convictions and sentences for their espionage against the military of the United States and Cuban exiles in southern Florida. A special mission of the Cuban network, Operacion Escorpion, lead to the murder of four men when Cuban military jets shot down two private aircraft over international waters in 1996. Each Cuban agent was convicted of espionage charges, and one agent was convicted of conspiracy to murder, following a trial in Miami that lasted more than six months. Our Court, en banc, affirmed the denial of the Cuban agents’ motions for a change of venue and a new trial and remanded this appeal to this panel for consideration of the remaining issues. United States v. Campa, 459 F.3d 1121, 1154–55 (11th Cir. 2006) (enbanc).

    The Cuban agents raise a host of issues on appeal. The Cuban agents challenge rulings about the suppression of evidence from searches conducted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, sovereign immunity, discovery of information under the Classified Information Procedures Act, the exercise of peremptory challenges, alleged prosecutorial and witness misconduct, jury instructions, the sufficiency of the evidence in support of their convictions, and several sentencing issues. We conclude that the arguments about the suppression of evidence, sovereign immunity, discovery, jury selection, and the trial are meritless, and sufficient evidence supports each conviction. We also affirm the sentences of two defendants, but we remand in part for resentencing of the other three defendants.

    http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200117176.opn3.pdf

  • The missing party at the table are the Brothers from Biran. A free press, free speech, legalize other political parties, stop harassing dissidents and freeing political prisoners…which of these do you believe the Castros will be willing to compromise first?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *