Cuba’s Urban Agriculture and Livestock Production

By Carlyle MacDuff


HAVANA TIMES – Following the implosion of the USSR in 1989/90, which previously gave major financial and economic support to Cuba, Fidel Castro found it necessary to impose what he described as the “Special period”. This meant that Cuban’s had to further tighten their belts and not only survive on reduced rations, but find means of obtaining additional funds to extend those rations with purchases on the ilicit market, which still forms an essential component of Cuba’s economy.

The Castro regime ever cunning in converting a liability into an asset, honed in upon the need for the urban community to develop what during the Second World War were described in the UK as allotments. In Cuba they call them “urban agriculture” and take visiting overseas groups on tours to see their benefits. The major product of this urban agriculture is lettuce of rapidly wilting varieties rather than cos types, produced on raised beds.

Although thus displaying the horticultural side of urban agriculture, the regime fails to take the tours to visit urban livestock producers of whom there are many thousands and are economically more important.

Their major product is pork from pigs kept in fairly unsavory conditions in the small backyards behind the ramshackle homes. Usually kept in sties made with concrete block walls and rough metal roofing, the pigs are when adult, then sold to those who sell pork for a living from their front porch having been slaughtered by having their throats slit.

Rooftop livestock raising.

In addition to the pigs, a few hens and cockerels – some used for illegal cock fighting, peck around and a fortunate few Cubans keep a horse to pull their little sulkies as family transport. Keeping guard over the assorted livestock there will be a dog chained permanently to an old oil drum as a kennel.

The consequences of such livestock urban agriculture are that the urban neighbors are not only subject to that unmistakable rural farmyard stench, but to the squeal of the pigs, the crowing of the cockerels and the incessant barking of the miserable curs.

This is particularly noticeable during the evening and at night. Loudly crowing Cuban cockerels peculiarly seem to recognize midnight as the start of a new day with the piteous whimpering and howling of hungry dogs especially when there is rain, adding to the chorus.

There remains but one obvious question. Why doesn’t the regime demonstrate the livestock part of Cuba’s urban agriculture to visiting groups? Is it that they don’t wish to admit that their state system fails to supply sufficient protein, or do they not wish to disclose the pitiful conditions under which both the animals and the citizens co-exist?

Related Post: Urban Animal Farms in Havana

9 thoughts on “Cuba’s Urban Agriculture and Livestock Production

  • There’s nothing poor about Cuba it is Rich in intellectual currency.
    Elite? Right and the 100 million that dictator Batista absconded with to Spain stealing money from the people.
    Cuba is in ruins because of economic sanctions, people who leave that out really are either ignorant, liars or purposely want to cover up the misery that the campesinos lived under when Batista was in power.
    And regarding this article the Cuban government is not cunning it is resourceful.

  • Nick is so intent upon his purpose of denigrating all that is related to his view of capitalism, that he misses the whole point of the article.

    Other countries Nick, do not organize group tours of lettuce beds as if they are a unique conception emanating from communist thought. But, Cuba does!

    It is undoubtedly factual that the livestock part of urban agriculture in Cuba is of greater economic significance than the lettuce beds. But it is not demonstrated!

    That comparison obviously poses a question! The one which the article addresses, and which you chose to ignore.

    I have visited only some thirty plus countries, and as an agriculturalist have noted – and in some studied, agricultural systems and methods, some as small scale as the Cuban lettuce beds. But, whereas there is for example, much to be learned from the Kibbutz of Israel and trickle irrigation, both horizontal and vertical (kohl rabi grown16 high, for shipping to Marks and Spencer) there is little to be learned agriculturally in Cuba and specifically from the much vaunted “urban agriculture”. That lack of initiative and progress in a country of historically proven agricultural potential is a consequence of the politically imposed system.

    Even tiny enterprises can be the source of new concepts. In today’s world, virtually all supermarkets offer tomatoes “on the vine”. But the concept and introduction, was by a very small grower in the salt tolerant rashes at the southern end of the Dead Sea – back in 1991. I offer that as an illustration of progressive thinking and superb marketing initiated by an individual – the commercial capitalist world adopted.

    Mention of Israel reminds me that Cuba markets the little that remains of its originally substantial citrus crop, through a capitalist company in Tel Aviv!

  • Nick, could it be that the Cuban Communist Party government has perfected the art of shooting yourself in the foot (or stomach in this case)? Remember everything that Fidel, Raul and company do is with good intentions while anti-popular policies in other countries are by the evil capitalists.

  • The key question that this clever article provokes is this:
    Why does Mr MacD imply that a phenomenon is specific to Cuba when it is blatantly the case that this phenomenon is prevalent throughout many countries which are toward the bottom end of the capitalist ladder?

    I think the answer is obvious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *