Circles Robinson, editor

Photo: Caridad

HAVANA TIMES — It seems that within a line of attack against other Cuban bloggers and audivisual projects, it is becoming fashionable to include slander against Havana Times.

We received a first shot from Cubadebate, and now another one has been posted on the Rebelion website, an attack written by journalist and former Cuban State Security agent Percy F. Alvarado Godoy.

Both articles focus their accusations on blogger Yoani Sanchez and the Estado de Sats project, while accusing Havana Times (HT) of promoting them.

For people who don’t know us, HT is a digital publication for discussion and analysis concerning Cuban life. It is formed from the wide-ranging viewpoints of its columnists and contributors, as well as from readers’ comments, which are also diverse.

True to this principle of pluralistic inclusion — and although the editor of Havana Times does not have any personal relationships with the Estado de Sats team — our site did publish an interview with its founder and several articles that mentioned of its meetings. In addition, one of our collaborators interviewed Yoani Sanchez, and on another occasion we published a second interview with that blogger.

We are of the conviction that only by giving space to a diverse spectrum of voices is it possible to have a full view of the complex reality, which is a position in accordance with the paradigms of professional journalism. This is why HT distances itself from those (be they supposed official leaders or those of the opposition) who try to kidnap the “truth,” monopolizing it for their own benefit.

Therefore, we will continue announcing and covering the activities of the Estado de Sats as well as other media, autonomous projects and other governmental and non-governmental institutions and organizations, as is the desire of the contributors to HT.

At the same time, we will continue to allow for various comments and criticisms of those articles in the spaces provided after each of them.

Returning to the article by Alvarado Godoy, in the blog of an HT contributor there appears the essay “Appeal Against Censorship in Cuba,” in which the author presents his opinion on that subject. At the end he includes a public letter and a list of signatures of people who reject the practice of censorship in Cuba.

At the same time, it should be clarified that HT did not draft the petition or distribute it for signatures, though many of this website’s members and collaborators may have sympathized with the idea that censorship covering the media in Cuba should be lifted.

Another “toxic” point among these spurious rumors is the attempt to tie HT to the US Interests Section office in Havana (USIS).

I do admit that in 2003 I entered the USIS. This, though, was through its front door as a US citizen in order to renew my passport, since the Cuban government (my employer between 2002 and 2009) requires its foreign technicians to keep their documents updated.

Photo: Caridad

As to other relations with the US, I confess to the accusation that I was born in the US — as if this were a crime — though this was no obstacle to my working for the Cuban government for 7 ½ years or to my being a voting delegate at the last congress of the Union of Journalists of Cuba (UPEC), in July 2008.

As for HT’s relationship with the Cuban authorities, we should note that Havana Times began as a project endorsed by UPEC president Tubal Paez, who — during the official introduction of the site at the UPEC headquarters in December 2008 — publicly offered his “support” for the project.

The main roots of HT go back to my active presence in the annual UPEC Press Festivals and in that organization’s congress, where journalists critically discussed the problems of the profession and the quality of information produced and disseminated to national and foreign readers.

Concerning the financing of the website, I have reiterated on various occasions that HT is self-funded by me with personal and family contributions. My hope was, and is, that one day HT could be a small non-commercial effort with its headquarters in Havana, like it was during its initial nine months of existence.

In short: the online magazine Havana Times is a wide-ranging publication open to various opinions about Cuban reality and to the frank discussion of proposals for the present and the future of the nation and the world.

It is made up of people possessing their own diverse opinions. We respect the opinions of others and do not seek to impose on others some monolithic line, which is a position difficult to understand for those accustomed to the media polarization on the issue of Cuba.

In the end, it’s worth remembering that wise phrase from of Don Quixote when he said to his faithful squire: “Let the dogs bark, Sancho. It’s a sign we’re on track!”

 

 


24 thoughts on “Havana Times and Some Low Blows

  • The probability is that you are unable to accurately define communism.

    Even a casua reading of HT would show that it presents a huge percentage of anti-revolutionary articles and comments that put the lie to the hysterical U.S inspired charge that Cuba has no freedom of speech and the thought that predominates the U.S public that anyone speaking out against the goivernment will be shot, jailed or otherwise silenced .
    I value HT for providing a website to which I frequently direct the dumbed-down people of the U.S. to show them CUBANS freely criticizing their government .

    FYI, The U.S. is at war with Cuba and has been for over 50 years. If you can point out any nation in history that has allowed the propaganda and propaganda spokespeople of an avowed enemy free rein , go to it.

  • As editor of an open forum magazine, Circles has to remain reasonably neutral, in order not to degrade the open forum. You should be patting him on the back for an arduous and gutsy job, not trying to insert a knife. You are nit-picking, without saying anything of substance.

  • Mr Daugherty, I do understand your points that to be an open forum a forum needs to be open, and that in order for its contributors to be able to write what is on their minds it must be open to their contributions.

    Being open doesn’t in itself make the forum “effective” though, at least to those of us who wooden-headedly believe that the effectiveness of such a political undertaking should be measured in terms of some greater good than just whether it facilitates the self-expression of those who happen to contribute to it.

    Calling my responses here an attack on Circles Robinson is to fall into the same error he made in his article above. Havana Times is not Circles Robinson, Havana Times is the publication. In other words, Havana Times is not the person of the editor but the ensemble of the contributions which make up the website. This is well understood by others, for example Mr Alvarado who in his article was correct in identifying Havana Times the website with its published contributions supporting Estado de SATS and the anti-censorship appeal. Havana Times is as it publishes.

    Mr Robinson feels he has been attacked with “low blows” because he identifies criticism of Havana Times and some of the entities it (i.e its group of contributors) supports with personal criticism of himself, but on the other hand he also rejects personal responsibility for the contributions to the website on the basis of its pluralism. That is, Havana Times is him when it’s being “attacked” but an open forum without responsibility when it’s a case of being responsible for its positions. I just hope Mr Robinson is able to sort out his conflicting attitude to the website to one where he can accept the legitimacy of criticism of the website’s de facto political positions without misconstruing the criticism (as he did in this case) as slander and taking it personally.

    I actually have a lot of sympathy for Mr Robinson, whose own writings are always very clearly among the best on the website, and I believe that the Havana Times experiment was worth trying and wish that it had been more successful. But any open forum tends to attract those who think alike with its core group and repel others, and thus over time tends to acquire a distinctive political and social identity. In the case of Havana Times, this process has produced the identity which Mr Alvarado described as anti-Cuban and which I described as left-liberal oppositionist. That Mr Robinson doesn’t wish to identify himself personally with the political positions that de facto define his site (e.g. its strong support for Estado de SATS) is at once his misfortune, the cause of this flap over Mr Alvarado’s article and a marker of the failure of the site as a political project.

  • Mr. Cheeseman, it is apparent that you have heard everything that has been said in response to your attack on HT and Circles Robinson; and it is apparent that you cannot understand or accept that, in order to have an open and effective forum, all viewpoint must be allowed, no encouraged to be expressed.

    Some of the writers who find publication in HT horrify and disgust me. But I myself may horrify and disgust many Marxists, in Cuba and worldwide, because I call Engels and Marx agent provocateurs and destroyers of socialism through state monopoly and a cult-of-personality, secular religion. You cannot seem to understand that, in order for me and others to write what is on our minds, we have to have a “Y’all Come” magazine and blog such as HT through which to write it.

    It is your kind of wooden-headed, bureaucratic socialism that has undermined and discredited socialism thus far. May I invite you to continue to say what you please through the pages of HT, whether you understand the value of the forum, or understand it not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *