Lula’s Rebirth Puts Brazil’s Military Far-right to the Test

Por Mario Osava (IPS)

Protests against President Jair Bolsonaro taking place in Brazil use the common slogan of “Get out, Bolsonaro!”. Like this one in Sao Paulo, driven by his disastrous handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Car caravans in order to prevent crowds and respect physical distancing measures. Unlike what the president is doing, who continues to meet with his followers without wearing a mask and keeping a safe distance. Bolsonaro’s losing his reelection bid in 2022 is now a possibility thanks to a decision from the Federal Supreme Court. Photo: Elineudo Meira / @fotografia.75- Public Photos

HAVANA TIMES – “Lula for president”, is the cry that different sectors in Brazil are raising after a Federal Supreme Court ruling that annulled criminal convictions against former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. It also represents the decline in the anti-corruption struggle that has had the Brazilian justice system spinning.

This overturn came on March 8th, with the verdict by Edson Fachin, one of the 11 Supreme Court magistrates. He annulled the two sentences that sentenced the former leader (2003-2010) to 26 years in prison for passive corruption and money laundering, as well as the veto on him from running in any election.

The new ruling states that the Curibita court that began the prosecution of Lula didn’t have the authority to do so. Therefore, the two sentences have been quashed and their validation by superior authorities, the appeals court and national Supreme Court, which increased Lula’s sentence and kept him in jail for 19 months, between April 2018 and November 2019.

Fachin’s ruling doesn’t mean Lula’s absolution though, as the Supreme Courty plenary will have to ratify this if an appeal is filed. The legal procedures that led to Lula’s convictions and another two currently in process are being transferred from the Curitiba court to one in Brasilia, where the former president is subject to other corruption-related legal proceedings.

However, it’s unlikely that a sentence will be given before the presidential elections in October 2022. Furthermore, ratification at a second level of arbitration would be needed in order for Lula to lose his political rights again, according to the Clean Slate Law which has tried to separate criminals from Brazilian politics, ever since 2010.

Thus, Lula’s rebirth as the natural candidate for his leftist Workers’ Party (PT) in next year’s presidential elections. President Jair Bolsonaro will be seeking reelection. His government is filled with far-right politicians and representatives of the Brazilian military. The later dominate his cabinet and hold other important public positions.

A survey by the Institute of Intelligence in Polls and Consultancy (IPEC) recognized Lula as the favorite to win, if he were to run. His votes potential, that is to say the voters who would definitely or possibly vote for him, is 50% right now, against the 44% that would rule him out.

In the case of president Jair Bolsonaro, a former Army captain, the figures are 38% and 56%, respectively. Another eight potential candidates received lower numbers of being the favorite and were rejected like the current president.

Lula’s political comeback represents a loss for judge Sergio Moro, who ruled the first sentence against the former president, convicted of receiving an apartment in Guaruja beach, near Sao Paulo, as a bribe from a construction company that was interested in state projects.

Moro led the anti-corruption campaign that was launched in 2014, with investigations into Operação Lava Jato (Operation Car Wash) by the Ministerio Publico (Public Prosecutor’s Office), with its main base of operations in Curitiba, the capital of the southern Parana state.

Judge Gilmar Mendes, from the Federal Supreme Court, while explaining the actions of former judge Sergio Moro that prove his “unacceptable bias” in prosecuting former president Luis Inacio da Silva. The sentence is awaiting the ruling from one judge, after two ruled in favor and two against, but it’s assumed he will vote against Moro. Photo: Fellipe Sampaio /SCO/STF- Public Photos

However, Moro’s court of first instance only had the power to rule on cases of corruption in Petrobras, the State’s oil company, that multiplied its investments during Lula’s administration and that of and his successor, Dilma Rousseff, who also belonged to the PT (2011-2016).

It was never proven in the proceedings against Lula that the alleged bribe was linked to a diversion of resources from Petrobras, Fachin recognized, while looking into a writ of habeas corpus from the former president’s defense, based on the Curitiba court’s lack of authority to rule in this case.

The decision was a bombshell for the legal and political world. Lawyers and many jurists had been questioning the procedural error since 2016, without anyone paying any heed, even the country’s supreme court. So, why has the judge responsible for Lava Jato trials in the Supreme Court only allowed this now, after Lula received three convictions?

The common answer seems to be that Fachin, a member of one of the court’s two divisions and one of the 11 judges who supported Lava Jato the most, had tried to salvage the operation. Sacrificing the court’s feat (sentencing the former president), would be a way to stop the offensive that brings different political forces together, interested in ending the investigations into their leaders.

However, if this was Fachin’s intention, it backfired.

It triggered immediate actions that could be a coup de grâce for Lava Jato, already slowing since 2019. That was the first year of Bolsonaro’s administration, when he abandoned his anti-corruption campaign banner. He proceeded to begin disarming the state agencies in the field.

For example, Fachin wanted to void another habeas corpus that Lula requested in 2018, based on Moro’s alleged partisanship. It lost its basis when he annulled Lula’s convictions, he argued.

However, the other division of the Supreme Court, which is in charge of the case, has rejected Fachin’s pretension and decided, on March 9th, to pick up on the discussion that began in late 2018. Two of the five members said that Moro was biased, overstepping his duties as a judge and acted as an investigator and accuser too. The decisive vote from the fifth member is still pending.

Moro’s conversations with prosecutors throughout the trial, which were leaked in June 2019 by digital newspaper The Intercept Brasil and published in other well-known international papers and media outlets, prove his collusion and political intention to convict Lula.

Judge Edson Fachin, defender of Brazil’s anti-corruption Operation Lava Jato, has annulled the criminal convictions against former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, in order to try and save this operation’s activities, but he is losing more and more ground in the country’s Supreme court. Photo: Rovena Rosa/Agência Brasil

Gilmar Mendes, the speaker and most assertive judge, listed seven irregularities and abuses committed in order to prove Moro’s partisanship, such as the illegal tapping of Lula’s lawyers’ phones, “coercive leading” (temporary arrest) to interrogate him and manipulation of the press in order to win support for his actions.

The final piece of evidence would be Moro’s allegiance with Bolsonaro’ government, in which he was the “super minister” of Justice for 16 months.

“What democratic country would accept a former judge who took the president’s main adversary out of the game, as the minister of Justice?” Mendes asked.

Moro held this position for almost 16 months. He resigned on April 24th 2020, after he rejected the president’s interference in the Federal Police, an agency that belonged to his old ministry.

The forced resignation of the country’s symbol of anti-corruption reflects the gradual decline of the Operation Lava Jato under Bolsonaro. It also became clear when he assigned people he trusted to lead the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Federal Police and other State agencies that should be independent and elect their own heads.

Since he joined the Supreme Court in 2002, Mendes has called the way Operation Lava Jato was conducted in Curitiba, under Moro’s leadership, “the greatest legal scandal in our history.”

It’s a symptom of the legal system’s decline, which he believes is authoritarian and is in need of “profound reforms of Criminal justice,” to prevent the establishment of a “totalitarian regime.”

He voted in favor of annulling the entire proceeding, even evidence collected against Lula. A new trial would have to begin from scratch in order to convict Lula for the apartment that was an alleged bribe, but in fact, it never belonged to the former president, nor did he ever use it.

The trial was left up in the air when two votes discredited Moro and two attested to his impartiality. The fifth member of the section, Kassio Nunes Marques asked for more time to study the case, as he only joined the Supreme Court four months ago.

It is expected that he will vote against Moro and, furthermore, another judge who voted in favor of Moro in 2018 has now said that she wants to amend her vote.

Everything seems to indicate that Lula will win this battle he’s been fighting for five years to prove his innocence, although several complaints, even from his former Finance minster, Antonio Palocci, and other proven acts of corruption have tarnished his government’s reputation.

In 2018, Lula’s sentence from Moro and that of the appeals court, the Federal Regional Court, prevented him from running for president. The military pressured the Supreme Court not to release him for a habeas corpus, since the PT was already thinking of replacing their candidate, Fernando Haddad, with Lula, their top leader. Bolsonaro defeated Haddad in the elections.

Lula’s election campaign will benefit from his government’s legacy of reducing poverty and inequality, with economic growth and greater citizen participation. Corruption charges are cooling down as a factor for his rejection, in the face of Bolsonaro’s disastrous handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and his socio-economic policies, as well as his attacks against democracy.

Read more features here on Havana Times.


5 thoughts on “Lula’s Rebirth Puts Brazil’s Military Far-right to the Test

  • March 15, 2021 at 9:43 am
    Permalink

    Olga,
    I most sincerely do not try to patronise.
    I am sorry that you think so.
    I learnt to speak Spanish in Cuba. My Spanish is good but imperfect. I use -ita or -ito etc as terms of familiarity or endearment. I certainly do not do this to try and offend or patronise. If that’s how its coming across, then apologies. I shall put Olga from now on.
    Everyone has their opinion. My understanding is that in the USA, trump attempted an attack on democracy backed up by his right wing supporters.
    In the eyes of the world they damaged the USA’s democratic status but I am pleased that they were not able to destroy it. The USA is a 2 party state. One of these parties has clearly been enormously damaged by recent events. I mean damaged in terms of its claim to have any democratic credentials.
    My understanding of Brazil is that it has gone through various different forms of leadership/governance over the years and decades. Some more ‘democratic’ than others.
    The likes of trump and bolsonaro attack scientific and medical opinion. Their lies are responsible for hundreds of thousands of Covid deaths. They attack environmentalists and are responsible for much environmental destruction (and potential destruction if they can get away with it). These individuals are not interested in the views of experts. These individuals simply wish to dictate (to use your word Olga).
    So these individuals are good at manipulating outcomes of plebiscites?
    That doesn’t make them any less dangerous or any less responsible for the hundreds of thousands of deaths they have caused?
    If Cuba transforms itself into a modern 21st century democracy (eg: Scandinavia, New Zealand etc) then I’m cool with that all day long. I’m happy with that scenario.
    If a right wing, anti-science, anti environment, racist bigot such as bolsonaro ever comes to power in Cuba, that would be a disaster. For me it would be a clear and definite step backwards.
    That’s just my opinion.
    Regarding Nicaragua or Venezuela – I hope for the best for these countries.
    I don’t tend to comment on these countries because I haven’t lived in either of them. Never even been there.

  • March 15, 2021 at 1:30 am
    Permalink

    Muck I’m not defending anyone I just trying to remind you that those liars were elected by the people if the people regret later on in a democratic system there is always a chance to elect someone else next time in Cuba after 62 years the people don’t have that opportunity. But little nick ( my bane is Olga not Olguita. I will appreciate if you stop trying to patronizing me) You seems very concerned with Bolsonaro political decisions but very silent about the Nicaragua horrible situation and Venezuela crisis. Where the even shoot civilians for only protesting. Hum. On Nick.

  • March 14, 2021 at 5:40 pm
    Permalink

    Olgita,
    Yet again you fail to read my comment and therefore misinterpret.
    ‘Cuba definitely has it’s issues with corruption’.
    That’s what I said. That is not defending anything.

    Olgita, you consistently defend corrupt, lying, right wing extremist politicians. These are the people who put at risk the future well-being of planet earth and therefore the hopes of the human race.
    Furthermore, these two bigots consistently tell anti-science, Covid lies and are therefore responsible for hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths over the past year. They are far more dangerous than the current Cuban leader or any previous Cuban leader.
    But you always make excuses for them and defend them ??

  • March 14, 2021 at 9:50 am
    Permalink

    Nick, one more time. Bolsonaro was elected by 67% of the ppl of Brazil.
    Lula a corrupt leftist that stole money from the ppl in Brazil got pardon and may run again for president. In Cuba a family that not one elected has settled in power for over 60 years denied to people the freedom to assemble, to organize opposition, freedom of press, with one party, the communist party telling the ppl of Cuba that the communist party is the only one than can think and decide for 11 millions Cubans .
    Incarcerating , harassing or sending to exile anyone who dare to oppose to them . THAT IS A DICTATORSHIP.
    Is not suggested it’s tangible. If not ask those Cubans doctors that were working as slaves for the Cuban government in Brazil and over fifteen hundred of them decided to stay in Brazil leaving theirs families and live one behind and stay under Bolsonaro government that go back to the Caribbean paradise. For you in Cuba rule a democratic government. But perception and reality are two different things, what is interesting is the fact that you add those who defend the Cuban dictatorship don’t live in the proletarian paradise in the Caribbean.

  • March 13, 2021 at 3:41 pm
    Permalink

    It is suggested that Cuba is not a democracy.
    But what countries are Cuba compared to??
    Cuba is compared to countries in the region such as Brazil and the USA.
    It is suggested that these countries are democracies and that Cuba is not.
    How can a country be described as a democracy when the judiciary is appointed by corrupt, right wing extremist politicians such as the likes of bolsonaro and trump? The whole world can see that these two disgraceful individuals are compulsive liars and repulsive bigots.
    It’s weird how people jump to conclusions regarding what constitutes a democracy and what doesn’t.
    Corruption is there for all to see. Cuba definitely has it’s issues with corruption. But so do the so-called democracies of Brazil and the USA.

    On a slightly different point:
    Bolsonaro may well be booted out on his sorry ass same as the liar trump was, but no-one will ever replace the swathes of Amazonian rainforest that have been destroyed during his corrupt and disgraceful presidency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *